The Economist, a
conservative weekly British weekly newspaper, recently featured a very
interesting article on mergers of companies. Inspired by the opposition and
subsequent failure of the Pfizer Astra-Zeneca takeover, it sought to explain
why so many seemingly ideal mergers often collapsed so quickly. It concluded
that mergers where there was no clear dominant party, or where insufficient takeover
plans were implemented were doomed to fail almost right from the start. Bosses
of companies would invariably clash over who had more control and thus handed
the impetus to their competitors.
This line of thinking could have easily been extended to
include the political hemisphere. Political mergers, or coalitions as they are
called, are common in democracies, yet one would have to wonder why. Often
times they are a necessity, but they almost all invariably result in failure.
It should be noted for that the purposes of this analysis, we shall deem there
to be two instances were a coalition fails. The first is where it breaks down
leading to a change in government or a snap election. In modern, Western
democracies this is relatively rare. While it certainly does happen, most
parties realise that it will only end up hurting their interests and so try to
avoid this outcome if at all possible. The second possibility of failure is
whereby one party, as a direct result of the coalition, becomes so unpopular as
to lose so many seats in the next election that they make the continuation of the
coalition impossible.
This is a very common outcome, and has happened an
extraordinary number of times in recent years. The reasons are simple.
Inevitably, one party in the coalition will be larger than the other. This
larger party therefore gets the key posts in the new government and becomes the
face of the country’s leadership. The smaller party, having less of a mandate
and being more replaceable, is bullied into implementing the policies of its
partner. The smaller party is seen by those who voted for them to have betrayed
their principles and subsequently get walloped at the polls.This happens in all
democracies, no matter the country. In
Ireland the Greens, after supporting the unpopular Fianna Fáil, lost all their
seats at the next election, as did the Progressive Democrats in the election
before that. The Lib Dems in Britain are almost certain to be decimated in the
next election, while their partners, the Conservatives could yet remain in power. Looking towards
Germany, the Social Democrats and the Free Democratic Party were trounced after
having supported Angela Merkel’s party, the CDU.
Coalitions therefore, are likely to fail. Politicians surely
know this and so it must be asked, why enter one in the first place? The simple
fact is that the whole point of being in politics is to have power. While the
opposition can make a lot of noise from their benches, the reality is that
until they are in government, they have no true power. It is often better for a
party which will clearly never win a majority to enter into coalition, as that
way they shall at least be able to enact some of their policies. While they are
aware that in the long run they may lose support, being in a coalition government
is often the lesser of two evils.
What advice can we give to the smaller parties of
coalitions? If at all possible, only go into coalition with those parties who
are on the same side of the political spectrum as yourself. The main goal is to
ensure your policies are enacted. This means choosing the ministries which give
you the most opportunity to do this. For liberals, this means departments such
as Health, Education, Social Welfare etc. Greens should aim for the environment
and energy. Agriculture, Immigration and Defence tend to appeal more to the
right-wing vote and so their parties should demand these positions. While the
economic well-being of the country is very important to all citizens, the
largest party is never going to give up control of the Treasury and so it is
pointless to demand it. A key mistake to avoid is to accept the position of
deputy prime minister. Unlike vice-president, this is a rather pointless
position and usually only serves the purpose as to make the leader of your
party seem like a lackey of his larger coalition partner.
Coalitions are popular in Democracies, and will continue to
be so although more from necessity than desire. They are prone to failure and
can lead to fractious governments. However, so long as all parties to the
coalition can reach a compromise and ensure that their policies are all being enacted
in some way, then they succeed. It is a difficult task yes, but not impossible.
No comments:
Post a Comment